-
Advertorial
-
FOCUS
-
Guide
-
Lifestyle
-
Tech and Vogue
-
TechandScience
-
CHTF Special
-
Nanshan
-
Futian Today
-
Hit Bravo
-
Special Report
-
Junior Journalist Program
-
World Economy
-
Opinion
-
Diversions
-
Hotels
-
Movies
-
People
-
Person of the week
-
Weekend
-
Photo Highlights
-
Currency Focus
-
Kaleidoscope
-
Tech and Science
-
News Picks
-
Yes Teens
-
Budding Writers
-
Fun
-
Campus
-
Glamour
-
News
-
Digital Paper
-
Food drink
-
Majors_Forum
-
Speak Shenzhen
-
Shopping
-
Business_Markets
-
Restaurants
-
Travel
-
Investment
-
Hotels
-
Yearend Review
-
World
-
Sports
-
Entertainment
-
QINGDAO TODAY
-
In depth
-
Leisure Highlights
-
Markets
-
Business
-
Culture
-
China
-
Shenzhen
-
Important news
在线翻译:
szdaily -> Opinion -> 
The hunt for native speakers
    2016-05-09  08:53    Shenzhen Daily

    Chris Edwards

    2045038940@qq.com

    OVER the last month or so, there has been considerable discussion among the expat community about the official removal of South Africa as a country of Native English speakers for Guangdong, a province where South Africans have traditionally sat in a gray area. There was further debate when rumor abounded that Ireland was to be removed from this same list, surprising many given the amount of English spoken by Irish people in Ireland.

    This got me thinking – if this policy was going to be effective (and actually enforced) across ALL of China, along with the restrictions around renewing Foreign Expert Certificates and the like (more than adequately discussed in other forums), soon there would be a dramatic decline in the number of foreign teachers teaching English to the 176 million students across China.

    So perhaps this is an opportunity for the Chinese Government to consider countries outside of the usual ones to provide potential native teachers of English.

    To do this, I considered countries where English is either the de jure (according to law) or de facto (in practice but not necessarily according to law) official primary language.

    After excluding Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America – I was left with 13 countries, including Antigua and Barbuda (population 85,000) and Bahamas (331,000).

    This collection of 11.6 million people across 13 countries are mostly in the Caribbean, most of them are visa-free for Chinese people to travel to and would expose the Chinese community to a wider range of views.

    In addition, the teachers coming from these countries would be learning new skills from other teachers – an opportunity that some of them would never otherwise have. The professional development opportunities on the Cook Islands or in Dominica are probably substantially limited.

    One more thing: if the list was expanded to include “non-sovereign entities” where English is either a de jure or de facto language, the list expands rapidly to include places including, but not limited to Guam, Jersey, American Samoa, Bermuda and Guernsey.

    This leaves SAFEA in a tough position – include some of these smaller countries and non-sovereign entities to encourage more foreign teachers to come to China, or reduce the number of countries and therefore reduce the number of teachers available?

    (The author is an Australian teacher teaching in Futian.)

深圳报业集团版权所有, 未经授权禁止复制; Copyright 2010, All Rights Reserved.
Shenzhen Daily E-mail:szdaily@szszd.com.cn