-
Advertorial
-
FOCUS
-
Guide
-
Lifestyle
-
Tech and Vogue
-
TechandScience
-
CHTF Special
-
Nanshan
-
Futian Today
-
Hit Bravo
-
Special Report
-
Junior Journalist Program
-
World Economy
-
Opinion
-
Diversions
-
Hotels
-
Movies
-
People
-
Person of the week
-
Weekend
-
Photo Highlights
-
Currency Focus
-
Kaleidoscope
-
Tech and Science
-
News Picks
-
Yes Teens
-
Budding Writers
-
Fun
-
Campus
-
Glamour
-
News
-
Digital Paper
-
Food drink
-
Majors_Forum
-
Speak Shenzhen
-
Shopping
-
Business_Markets
-
Restaurants
-
Travel
-
Investment
-
Hotels
-
Yearend Review
-
World
-
Sports
-
Entertainment
-
QINGDAO TODAY
-
In depth
-
Leisure Highlights
-
Markets
-
Business
-
Culture
-
China
-
Shenzhen
-
Important news
在线翻译:
szdaily -> World -> 
Fleet Street gives its take on Donald Trump’s UK visit
    2018-07-16  08:53    Shenzhen Daily

AS the helicopter-whisked dust settled on Donald Trump’s whirlwind visit to Britain, Fleet Street went into overdrive in giving its verdict on the president’s first visit since moving into the White House.

Quentin Letts, political sketchwriter for the Daily Mail, said of the U.S. president: “Is he a braggart? Of course. He kept saying how great he was, what a great job he was doing, praising himself almost more than he praised his ‘incredible’ hostess (Prime Minister Theresa May).”

Letts asked: “Does he bluster? You bet. Is he a bully? It is the bluster of a real estate deal-maker, of a man who, as he tours the world, stirs up as much dust as his helicopter’s blades. It is vulgar but it is also, after decades of political blandness, undeniably electrifying.”

The Guardian said May should have grasped that the U.S. president is an enemy of stability in Europe, adding now she should learn from her mistake.

“It may once, but also briefly, have seemed like a good idea to invite Donald Trump to Britain. But for Theresa May it all turned into a wrecking visit by the ally from hell. To make things worse, it was entirely her own fault,” the editorial said.

And yet, it added, some good may unexpectedly have come from the Trump visit.

“Mrs. May should have grasped from the very start that Mr. Trump was not an ally when it came to her Brexit strategy. Trump wants to break up international organizations like NATO and the EU. He embraced Brexit on that basis. He saw it as the start of a swing back towards nativist, illiberal, often racist nationalist politics, of which his own election was a further example.”

The Guardian said for May, fighting to control her Conservative party on the dominant issue facing Britain, it was simply a stab in the back. “But it wasn’t fundamentally personal. It was a declaration of hostility to Britain and Europe and the values they stand for.”

The Daily Telegraph commented that the paradox is that the U.S. president is more enthusiastic about Brexit than the prime minister of the United Kingdom, suggesting May’s vision of Brexit is a damage limitation exercise.

Describing Trump as baffling as ever, the Independent, said: “If the leader of the country we wish to make a deal with says it is unlikely, then it sounds unlikely.”

There was a more welcoming response from the Daily Express.

In its editorial, the newspaper said: “Make no mistake: whatever the U.S. president may have said in an unguarded moment earlier in the week, the leader of the free world wants to do business with us. And the timing could hardly be better.”(Xinhua)

深圳报业集团版权所有, 未经授权禁止复制; Copyright 2010, All Rights Reserved.
Shenzhen Daily E-mail:szdaily@szszd.com.cn