“We firmly believe there shouldn’t be any extra charge on WeChat because users have already paid for the cost of traffic generation. And to see the issue from a global perspective, we haven’t found any Apps resembling WeChat that required customers to pay for the service, therefore we are confident that a win-win situation could be achieved between telecom operators and tech firms.”

    — Liu Chiping, president of Tencent

    RESPONDING to netizens’ complaints about the possibility of being charged for using the mobile chat application WeChat, the president of Chinese Internet giant Tencent, Liu Chiping, said Sunday that the company’s popular software will remain free.

    Liu made the remarks at a roundtable discussion at the Boao Forum for Asia, held from Saturday to yesterday in South China’s Hainan Province.

    The app’s large user base will offer room for cooperation with telecom operators, Liu said, adding that there will be no need to charge people for using the app.

    Liu’s announcement came after Miao Wei, minister of industry and information technology, said in March that telecom service providers may be allowed to impose charges on the WeChat service.

    The remarks triggered strong reactions from netizens, who accused the country’s telecom operators of imposing unfair fees in a drive to maximize monopolistic profits.

    With its free voice messaging and photo-sharing features, WeChat has become immensely popular among China’s mobile users. According to Tencent, there were over 300 million WeChat users last year.

    Business insiders said the fees might be imposed on app service providers, rather than users, as many had suspected. But some feared that the rising costs would eventually be passed on to consumers.

    A poll that surveyed 25 WeChat users showed that 10 people (40 percent of the sample) said they would stop using WeChat on their phones if they were forced to pay a monthly charge of 10 yuan (US$1.6).

    Fair play?

    Telecom service providers China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom, say that WeChat and other over-the-top (OTT) content service providers should pay for generating excessive data flows, sometimes leading to traffic jams in signaling channels.

    Guo Ying, founder and CEO of VIVA Wireless New Media Co., explained that popular OTTs like WeChat operate by sending regular “heartbeat-like” signals, which can impose a heavy burden on a busy network.

    “Whether OTT messaging services should share the costs of network operations has become a topic of debate, and the debate is not unique to China,” said Wang Jianzhou, former chairman of China Mobile, who was also speaking at a sub-forum of Boao.

    “The surging data flow created by OTTs has led to rising operational costs for telecom operators, who have found it hard to make ends meet by merely charging users for their data flows,” Wang said.

    Other observers, however, said the arguments about data traffic belied the true conflicts between the ascending popularity of OTT services and dwindling usage of messaging services offered by telecom operators.

    The tremendous popularity of WeChat has apparently dealt a blow to similar services developed by China’s three major telecom operators.

    Moreover, free OTT services have allowed users to bypass traditional communication modes like phone calls and text messaging, two prime “cash cows” for telecom service providers, said Yan Xiaojia, an analyst with Analysys International, an Internet research institute.

    Data from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology shows that a total of 897.3 billion text messages were sent in China last year, up 2.1 percent year on year, compared with 6.2 percent growth registered in 2011. Experts say the services are losing many users to free messaging apps.

    “The rapid expansion of WeChat has taken away the profits of the telecom operators — this is why they raise their axes,” Yan said. (Xinhua)