-
Important news
-
News
-
Shenzhen
-
China
-
World
-
Opinion
-
Sports
-
Kaleidoscope
-
Photos
-
Business
-
Markets
-
Business/Markets
-
World Economy
-
Speak Shenzhen
-
Leisure
-
Culture
-
Travel
-
Entertainment
-
Digital Paper
-
In-Depth
-
Weekend
-
Lifestyle
-
Diversions
-
Movies
-
Hotels and Food
-
Special Report
-
Yes Teens!
-
News Picks
-
Tech and Science
-
Glamour
-
Campus
-
Budding Writers
-
Fun
-
Futian Today
-
Advertorial
-
CHTF Special
-
Focus
-
Guide
-
Nanshan
-
Hit Bravo
-
People
-
Person of the week
-
Majors Forum
-
Shopping
-
Investment
-
Tech and Vogue
-
Junior Journalist Program
-
Currency Focus
-
Food and Drink
-
Restaurants
-
Yearend Review
-
QINGDAO TODAY
在线翻译:
szdaily -> Glamour -> 
Appeals Court revives copyright lawsuit over ‘Shape of Water’
    2020-06-24  08:53    Shenzhen Daily

On Monday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals breathed new life into a copyright lawsuit alleging that Guillermo del Toro’s Oscar-winning “The Shape of Water” infringed the work of Pulitzer Prize-winning author Paul Zindel.

“Here, the district court erred by dismissing the action because, at this stage, reasonable minds could differ on whether there is substantial similarity between ‘Let Me Hear You Whisper’ and ‘The Shape of Water,’” states a memorandum opinion. “Though both works properly were presented to the district court, additional evidence, including expert testimony, would aid in the objective literary analysis needed to determine the extent and qualitative importance of the similarities that Zindel identified in the works’ expressive elements, particularly the plausibly alleged shared plot sequence.”

The decision marks a setback for Searchlight, which was one of the units sold by Rupert Murdoch to The Walt Disney Co. in March of last year. The studio had thought it had knocked out a case that was filed on the eve of the 2018 Academy Awards, where “Shape of Water” earned best picture.

Back in July 2018, U.S. District Court Judge Percy Anderson saw some similarities between the two works, but not enough to move forward. For example, he wrote, “Although the play and the film share the basic premise of an employee at a scientific facility deciding to free a creature that is subjected to scientific experiments, that concept is too general to be protected.”

Today, the appeals court rules that Zindel’s heirs should have gotten greater opportunity to explore these issues. The memorandum adds, “Additional evidence would also illuminate whether any similarities are mere unprotectable literary tropes or ‘scènes à faire.’”

Says a spokesperson for Searchlight Pictures, “The plaintiff’s claims will have no greater merit the second time around in district court and we are confident we will prevail against this baseless complaint.” (SD-Agencies)

深圳报业集团版权所有, 未经授权禁止复制; Copyright 2010-2020, All Rights Reserved.
Shenzhen Daily E-mail:szdaily@126.com