-
Advertorial
-
FOCUS
-
Guide
-
Lifestyle
-
Tech and Vogue
-
TechandScience
-
CHTF Special
-
Nanhan
-
Asian Games
-
Hit Bravo
-
Special Report
-
Junior Journalist Program
-
World Economy
-
Opinion
-
Diversions
-
Hotels
-
Movies
-
People
-
Person of the week
-
Weekend
-
Photo Highlights
-
Currency Focus
-
Kaleidoscope
-
Tech and Science
-
News Picks
-
Yes Teens
-
Fun
-
Budding Writers
-
Campus
-
Glamour
-
News
-
Digital Paper
-
Food drink
-
Majors_Forum
-
Speak Shenzhen
-
Business_Markets
-
Shopping
-
Travel
-
Restaurants
-
Hotels
-
Investment
-
Yearend Review
-
In depth
-
Leisure Highlights
-
Sports
-
World
-
QINGDAO TODAY
-
Entertainment
-
Business
-
Markets
-
Culture
-
China
-
Shenzhen
-
Important news
在线翻译:
szdaily -> Markets
Ex-trader’s lawsuit against regulator accepted
     2014-February-20  08:53    Shenzhen Daily

    A BEIJING court has agreed to accept a lawsuit filed against China’s securities regulator by the former head of a trading unit at Chinese brokerage Everbright Securities, who is contesting the punishment he received for insider trading.

    Yang Jianbo, former general manager of a high-frequency trading unit at Everbright Securities, and three colleagues were banned for life from the securities industry and fined 600,000 yuan (US$99,000) each by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) in late August after its investigation determined that they had committed insider trading.

    Yang’s lawyer, Li Jiang, a partner at the Beijing-based Zhong Zhao Law Firm, submitted a complaint to Beijing First Intermediate Court on Feb. 8.

    “The court has accepted the suit. Now we’ll move forward with the case according to normal legal procedure,” Yang said Tuesday.

    The CSRC found that after a computer malfunction during morning trade Aug. 16, which caused Everbright Securities to take a 7.27 billion yuan long position in a commonly-traded exchange-traded fund, Yang and his colleagues committed insider trading by partially unwinding that position in afternoon trade without properly disclosing the original trading error.

    Yang claims that the existence of a trading error doesn’t qualify as inside information and that subsequent trades designed to unwind them were in line with the unit’s normal hedging strategy, not an exceptional response to the mistaken orders. (SD-Agencies)

深圳报业集团版权所有, 未经授权禁止复制; Copyright 2010, All Rights Reserved.
Shenzhen Daily E-mail:szdaily@szszd.com.cn